<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadcasting Brain - Latest Comments in What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/</link><description>Harvesting cognitive surplus for uncanny content</description><atom:link href="https://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/what_does_getting_smarter_really_mean_13/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:56:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1994512</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Sure, why not?  As long as you don't need blood and sleep deprivation isn't involved.  You can reach me at contact  AT   broadcasting-brain DOT com.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:56:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1987597</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Out of curiosity, does participation in these sites make your research more difficult?  Isn't it harder to be objective?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:10:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1986822</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello Brynn and thanks for stopping by.  I suspected this topic would right up your alley based on what I read at your blog.  A number of my readers and social media contacts dive frequently and sometimes deeply into social media streams.  FriendFeed is a central place where many streams of data converge via RSS feed aggregation, but you're probably already aware of that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your point about being willing to put in time and effort to make productive use of these tools is well taken.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 15:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1984440</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent point about hard work!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:24:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1984367</link><description>&lt;p&gt;For the record, I've tried to indicate above that Robert and Jeremiah are both very bright guys.  They are certainly becoming more knowledgeable and probably wiser through their reading, but I think they are both at the point where this activity by itself won't make them any smarter.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:24:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1982883</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If I understand you correctly, being "smart" has a lot to do with skill and ability and I would agree.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:13:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1979575</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another way to say it is that being knowledgeable and "well" informed is only one piece of the puzzle of being smart.  Generally speaking, intelligence and "smartness" have a lot of stereotypes and assumptions that a lot of studies in cognitive sciences are proving wrong. I guess it's because we are still mystified by intelligence. The idiot savants, the child prodigy, the genius, or the intellectual bookworm. We sometimes forget that getting smart or having breakthroughs (which is the end goal for the majority. not a lot are trying to get smart just for the sake of it) is most of the time really just hard work. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:24:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1979527</link><description>&lt;p&gt;sorry but just because a person uses social media tools doesn't mean they are going to be smarter over the time of using them. You can sit the dumbest person in the world in the middle of the Library of Congress and chanes are they will end up reading the magazines. Just the fact that they have access to all the brilliant works of our society doesn't mean they will use them to improve themselves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;People have to want to learn and the web in general while it gives them the tools to make themselves smarter quite often can have the opposite effect. Look at the denegration of the English language or how easily we all fly into name calling only because the other person involved is unknown and invisible to you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In this case I'm definitely on your side of  the points being made.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:19:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1979334</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To me, being smart is a measure of how you well you can analyze/respond in a given situation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How well can you take all your knowledge and experience and either create or react with the greatest effectiveness.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 13:02:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1978934</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Shoot, I meant to bring in the wisdom angle as well.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Yeah, you have a good method there.  Kind of like going back to college/university, though..  :)  But it works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:25:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1978759</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Mark, I love this post! Is a library smart? HA! I think that "consuming" does make you smarter, provided you "consume smartly" like how Brian Clark recently wrote about on Copyblogger.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A simple way to be smarter about this is to not ever take in anything passively after the first go-through (yes, read/watch more than once). I take notes as I watch, read, or listen, and it has made a huge difference in my retention and in how I act on information.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And there is yet one more level above smarts and that's wisdom, which comes (hopefully) from doing, not reading. You have to put the book down and make things happen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michael Martine</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 12:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1976063</link><description>&lt;p&gt;My main beef, and it was being nit-picky, was that "smarter" was being misused in this context.  On the other hand, that happens a lot with other terms, but in the case it stuck in my mind.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I like your reference to Randy Pausch.  Makes me wonder if our blogs will exist in any format at all 5, 10, 20, or even 50 years from now and whether or not they will have any lasting value.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for stopping by.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 09:27:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What does getting smarter really mean?</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/01/smarter/#comment-1975948</link><description>&lt;p&gt;And thus ChangeForge was born... well that is the intent I cling to ;-) Good reading, Mark - especially in your conclusion whereby the application of gathered information can lead to increased knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Likewise, after reflecting a bit on the concept of simple consumption of information - you are also correct in that this is simply entertainment. I have been asking myself lately whether writing makes enough of a difference in the world?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At some thought - and especially in review of Randy Pausch's life - yes it can. But more importantly, it is the application of Randy's knowledge through his many lectures and actions in life that made the most difference. His writing simply allowed his message to 1) read a wider audience and 2) speak for him after he left.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I came to the simple conclusion that I can only hope that my writing can become a catalyst to affect the paradigm, and more importantly I must impact the world in the small ways I can each and every day.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In my humble opinion, there is wisdom in that course of action.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChangeForge | Ken Stewart</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 09:06:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>