<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadcasting Brain - Latest Comments in Thoughts on blog subscriber counts</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/</link><description>Harvesting cognitive surplus for uncanny content</description><atom:link href="https://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/thoughts_on_blog_subscriber_counts/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:28:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts on blog subscriber counts</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/08/21/thoughts-on-blog-subscriber-counts/#comment-16012111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Broadcast your self!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Digital Frame: &lt;a href="http://www.digitalframeguy.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.digitalframeguy.com/"&gt;http://www.digitalframeguy....&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">digitalframeguy09</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 00:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on blog subscriber counts</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/08/21/thoughts-on-blog-subscriber-counts/#comment-15266295</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Adam, I really appreciate the support.   :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:31:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on blog subscriber counts</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/08/21/thoughts-on-blog-subscriber-counts/#comment-15266282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is what it is.   :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:31:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on blog subscriber counts</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/08/21/thoughts-on-blog-subscriber-counts/#comment-15250900</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Feedburner count is pretty meaningless.  It's not how many, it's who is reading your stuff :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With that said I hope I've helped your numbers get up at least a little, I try to share your stuff when I can Mark - I'm one of your 'raving fans.'  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Singer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:54:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Thoughts on blog subscriber counts</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/08/21/thoughts-on-blog-subscriber-counts/#comment-15246933</link><description>&lt;p&gt;FeedBurner counts hits on the page that come through RSS. I ran a test on this a few weeks ago - I subscribed to a sandbox blog in five places, and hit the page on different days from these places in different numbers. Firefox live bookmarks, an RSS pull on another site of mine as a control, Google Reader which I almost never load unless it's on purpose - the days I omitted loading Firefox and browsed with Chrome, that hit disappeared. Having intentionally counted my hits, the results were surprising. Inflating numbers works, but it's so damned time consuming, even as a week long test.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, to the optimist, this means that 2447 number I see on your chicklet may mean many thousands of people subscribed who simply haven't hit your site today.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ian M Rountree</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:49:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>