<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadcasting Brain - Latest Comments in The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/</link><description>Harvesting cognitive surplus for uncanny content</description><atom:link href="https://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_value_of_an_idea/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:05:43 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/28/the-value-of-an-idea/#comment-4082266</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great discussion and I agree. I don't take offense to disagreement, it's natural and makes the world go round. I can use your insight as pieces of a bigger picture. I learn from you too. :-)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I was making reference only to the generalization of 'ideas'..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ideas aren't  impractical in and of themselves. Sometimes it takes quite a while for ideas to materialize, sometimes yes they are stolen (ok, maybe more than sometimes. It's already happened to me)  sometimes they are improved upon by someone else etc..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When those things occur, it's not the ideas that were impractical, it's typically due to faulty implementation. or, sadly enough, because we trust in ones we shouldn't trust. (stolen ideas)&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kimberly Bock</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 09:05:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/28/the-value-of-an-idea/#comment-4082032</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kimberly, respectfully I disagree.  Ideas can often be impractical due to technology being insufficient at the time (think airplanes in the 1800's), lack of the necessary knowledge base or funds to properly market a concept, or even an idea that in itself is great - but easily stolen by well placed competitors.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry to be negative, but this is a great post &amp;amp; discussion.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wade</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 08:37:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/28/the-value-of-an-idea/#comment-4065360</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Like a peanut butter and jelly sandwich..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bread is still bread. The peanut butter is still peanut butter. Neither of them are any different that the original.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not like typical media today, (social, TV, radio etc)..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Much of the media seem to enjoy distortion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They have bread. They have peanut butter. When nobodys looking, they scrape the peanut butter off the bread and give us baloney instead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kimberly Bock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 19:31:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/28/the-value-of-an-idea/#comment-4065158</link><description>&lt;p&gt;But if it is changed into something workable, then is it the same idea?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 18:51:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/28/the-value-of-an-idea/#comment-4061807</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An idea is never impractical.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If noted by the right ones, it can be expanded upon, rearranged, bent, twisted and molded into something completely different.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It takes a reader/hearer of the idea in question, to have an open inquisitive mind. One that doesn't know how to "settle" for 'deficits'.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Kimberly Bock</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 12:03:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/28/the-value-of-an-idea/#comment-4049631</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Indeed and thanks for stopping by!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:06:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The value of an idea</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/11/28/the-value-of-an-idea/#comment-4049612</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The value of an idea often emerges over time. What seems odd now might later seem to be brilliant. What occurs to me as i read your post is that above all else, one should write down every idea they have. Keep a notebook, write them down, and review them now and again.  This simple practice alone can make a person dramatically more effective as a creative person.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">gregg fraley</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 08:02:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>