DISQUS

Broadcasting Brain: The right and wrong ways to get Twitter followers | Broadcasting Brain

  • Avi · 1 year ago
    I couldn't say it better Mark. Great post and not only for Twitter beginners.
  • Miragi · 1 year ago
    Sweet lot of food for thought! Thanks!
  • BarbaraKB · 1 year ago
    Good stuff here but, truly, less about followers & more about relationships. Twitter ain't Digg... thank God!
  • Mark Dykeman · 1 year ago
    @Miragi - thanks!

    @BarbaraKB - good call in relationships. I've stuck with Follower terminology because this post is really trying to answer a couple of questions (e.g. How do I get more Twitter followers? Why won't people follow me back on Twitter?), but relationships are the heart of the matter.
  • Viviane · 1 year ago
    "You need to be committed to a long term processing of sharing, helping, exchanging information, and building relationships gradually."

    Really informative post about the whys and wherefores.

    I also suggest you check out Darren Rowse's new blog about how to use Twitter:

    http://www.twitip.com/
  • graubart · 1 year ago
    Good post - and I fully agree, it's all about adding value to the conversation. The other key I'd add is to not measure yourself by your followers. I have about 250 followers and follow about 180. With that number, I can engage with those in my network. If I were to focus on the raw numbers, I'd end up with just a useless stream of information.

    PS - one typo in your sub-head - should be 140 characters, not words.

    --Barry

    (aka @graubart)
  • Mark Dykeman · 1 year ago
    @Viviane - thanks. I'm aware of Twitip as well but unfortunately I've not had the time to read it in detail.

    @graubart - I agree that we all have to find a group size that we're comfortable with. Your PS: the heading was written as I had intended. I wasn't speaking specifically about the 140 chr. limit of Twitter; I was trying to describe Twitter itself in 140 words or less. It was a bit of word play and the wording was intentional. Still, thanks for checking it out.
  • Pamela Weir · 1 year ago
    Great explanation of Twitter. I love the fair analogy. I think you've summed it all up.

    We all have the opportunity to create and be a part of very meaningful conversations. That's the best part. I had no idea what it was when I started, but I was lucky enough to follow one person who was using the service to its fullest potential. Everything grew from there.

    You'll never know what's possible until you jump in and start talking to people.
  • Mark Dykeman · 1 year ago
    Exactly.
  • Josh Fialkoff · 1 year ago
    Hi,

    You have written an interesting post.

    I'm not quite sure how your inclusion of the Twitter exchange between Ari and I fits into your argument though.

    This is especially true since your name is not on this blog (I'm assuming your name is Mark?).

    I don't think that having a handle on Twitter (like mine, Nooozeguy) is impersonal.

    In my case, for instance, it is easy to find my name. I am not hiding it all. I am merely trying to be consistent across the social media landscape (you can find out more about my reasoning in this post: http://www.nooozeguy.com/what-is-your-twitter-i...,

    Looking forward to discussing this further with you!

    Thanks,
    Josh
    (@nooozeguy on Twitter)
  • Mark Dykeman · 1 year ago
    Hi Josh:

    Although I did not mention it in this post, my Twitter user ID is @markdykeman, which you can see in Get in Contact! widget in the sidebar of my blog template. My name, an actual picture of myself, and other information about me can be found on the About Mark D. page (third tab from the left under the blog tagline in my blog header). Until recently my name was included in my blog's tagline, but I removed it because it seemed redundant. So I'd say that neither of us are attempting to hide our real names.

    With regards, to Ari's Tweet, I thought that these parts of his Tweet were particularly germane to this blog post:

    Greg: Be yourself on Twitter. Be as authentic as you can be. Be @Greg.

    If you are known as nooozeguy across multiple sites/platforms, then it makes sense to me to be consistent because you are already known as nooozeguy. It would make less sense to me if you worked for a company called Noozeguy and we couldn't find out who the real person was behind the name.

    Ari's Tweet just seemed to capture the essence of what I was trying to communicate. If I misinterpreted that, then that's my bad, Josh.
  • Ari Herzog · 1 year ago
    Authenticity is key. It has nothing and everything to do with Twitter. I don't care if you're a personal brand or a corporate brand; if you're not authentic, boo you!
  • adaml · 1 year ago
    Great thoughts. I think you are right - there is no way to build a large follower list overnight - @adamloving.
  • Vicki · 1 year ago
    A reason I don't follow that people rarelly mention: You have too many (mostly) Replies in your Twitter stream. I only see Replies if I follow both people. If you mostly @ then a)I'll never see anything you say and b) I wonder why you seem to have no original thoughts.

    Twitter is microblogging (micriosharing). You also need to say something yourself.
  • Mark Dykeman · 1 year ago
    You know, that's a very good point.
  • Michael Rowe · 1 year ago
    Great Post Mark, and appreciate the comment on the show. I have been really trying to figure out should I track the conversations as they grow or just dip myself in the stream of tweets.
  • Mark Dykeman · 1 year ago
    Thanks Michael. I think that after your Following list grows beyond a certain point, all you can really do is dip into the stream occasionally or elect to follow specific conversations in detail.
  • Eric Matas · 11 months ago
    Nice job -- kept me reading the whole way through! One quick thought:

    Need followers? Try using the new business card. It only requires one item: http://punchy.typepad.com

    ;-)
  • afallison · 6 months ago
    I'm just now really getting my feet wet with disqus. I am really loving the way it integrates with twitter and the other web 2.0 social platforms. ;)