<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadcasting Brain - Latest Comments in The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/</link><description>Harvesting cognitive surplus for uncanny content</description><atom:link href="https://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/the_blogroll_still_lives_but_we_are_killing_it_off_broadcasting_brain/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:53:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-8099890</link><description>&lt;p&gt;200 does seem like a lot, but whatever works for you.   :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:53:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-8088758</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's an interesting discussion. Someone just reviewed my blog and one of his comments was that I had too many links on my blog roll! I've got over 200 links to blogs and other resources that I think people might be interested in when they visit my blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I review my blog roll on a fairly regular basis, and I'm sure there are a few there that need purging, but I think they are all valid links. I subscribe to most of the blogs on my blog roll, but not all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd guess about half my readers get the posts via RSS, but the other half come from search engines and they will be seeing the blog roll, so I think it's a very important resource and I won't be cutting down on the number of entries. &lt;br&gt;If anything I plan to add even more blogs as I find them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Allen</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 22:45:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7330241</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Another thought might be to set it up like Facebook ... instead of your entire blogroll, you have a list of "3 other blogs I enjoy" and every time you refresh the page 3 new random blogs show up from your blogroll.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The up-side for those ON your BR is that they are more likely to actually get a referral from your website. For you, you save the space and build even better relationships with your BR-ers because you have figure out a way to ACTUALLY push some traffic their way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Like so many other times, if we take a little time to ask ourselves, "Blogrolls ... what problem are we really trying to solve here?" some interesting answers come about.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kosovodad</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:06:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7324641</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Agreed on the ongoing need for resources, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:13:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7315151</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A blogroll as a social tool may be being replaced - but as a list of resources and other things your readers might like I don't think it will go away. I may not click through to a blog very often, but when I do I really appreciate seeing suggestions from the blogger of where else I might like to go. I prefer it when the list is short and relevant or when it's broken into categories. Mine is set up with annotations and reached through a navigation link. It does need to be updated though...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth Robinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:44:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7304870</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe, but a blogroll is a lot easier to remove than an appendix.   :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:24:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7304727</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent point, and it makes a larger point about the use of social media as a whole. For too many people, SM have become an objective, not a tool. We want a blog because "that's what people are doing now" not because we can articulate what we want to do with it.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The blogroll is one of those things that became like your appendix; maybe necessary at one time, but perhaps evolution has caused its usefulness to pass?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;--Mike&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kosovodad</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:14:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7292199</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Won't that still encounter the same problems, though?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:13:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7289308</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm in the process of creating a blogroll, but not for the sidebar. Rather as a top navigational link.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ari Herzog</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7289277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm going to try to be more conscious of blogrolls for the next little while - it's unfortunate that sometimes they fall into that gray area of perception that we tend to block out (e.g. ads)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:46:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The blogroll still lives but we are killing it off | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/03/17/blogroll-lives-kill-it/#comment-7288330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's definitely lost its power for the reasons you mention like linking to Twitter and sharing feeds. Another reason why it has lost it's power is because of the buddy-blogger-link exchange-thing. Readers learned to ignore that part of the sidebar because it got too cumbersome. I still like the idea though, but that's because I'm kind of "old school". :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:10:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>