<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadcasting Brain - Latest Comments in Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/</link><description>Harvesting cognitive surplus for uncanny content</description><atom:link href="https://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/newspapers_serendipity_and_the_time_to_browse/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:00:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/21/newspapers-serendipity-reading/#comment-20787561</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hah, things they never told you before you became a parent, huh?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 12:00:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/21/newspapers-serendipity-reading/#comment-20783905</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I read the newspaper every day at lunch. I like giving my eyes a break from the screen, having something to hold, and being able to skim content as well as headlines. Besides, they have comics.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I enjoy my print magazines for much the same reasons, plus I can read them in between moments when my 2-year-old is awake. If I put the computer on she wants to see the monkeys. We should never have introduced her to Flickr. :D&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth Robinson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:50:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/21/newspapers-serendipity-reading/#comment-20774521</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Great post, Chris.  I commented on your blog as well.   Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:00:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/21/newspapers-serendipity-reading/#comment-20755425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Alas, the printed newspaper will steadily erode.. but news will live on.&lt;br&gt;Here's an ode to the newspaper from my blog.  &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/1kgSY4" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/1kgSY4"&gt;http://bit.ly/1kgSY4&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">chrismingryan</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:47:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/21/newspapers-serendipity-reading/#comment-20696149</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Glen, there does seem to be a difference between how generations get their news.  My parents are avid newspaper readers as well, but they've only gotten high speed Internet access during the past couple of years, which makes a difference.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another thing to consider is that in many cases we're still reading content generated by news organizations, just via electronic media.  However, if we slice and dice what we choose to read, we may lose some of the serendipity effect that Mathew wrote about.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:11:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Newspapers, serendipity, and the time to browse</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2009/10/21/newspapers-serendipity-reading/#comment-20692780</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't read newspapers personally but I know that my parents read one at home everyday. They are part of the generation that doesn't care about getting digital news. I think there is a definite decline in readership but not as much as most people are claiming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tweeted!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Glen&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Glen Allsopp</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:45:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>