<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Broadcasting Brain - Latest Comments in Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/</link><description>Harvesting cognitive surplus for uncanny content</description><atom:link href="https://broadcastingbrain.disqus.com/are_you_a_sequential_or_random_access_doer_broadcasting_brain/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:03:46 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2658023</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Seems like a common thing, ProgGrrl.  Thanks for stopping by, so say we all!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 12:03:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2657350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I am definitely more of a random-access worker, for the most part.  However, that falls away, and I find myself forcing a more linear process, whenever a huge deadline is looming, and/or there is a big project in the works with a lot of other people involved.  In other words, when time management and limited time are at issue, linear works best.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But I always fall back to random-access in my day-to-day&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ProgGrrl</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:58:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2625322</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it takes practice and discipline to switch, plus the awareness of what you are doing.  Awareness is very important.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:18:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2625302</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Beth.  I hadn't really thought about this concept in terms of the qualities of the brain's hemispheres, but that's a good  point to consider.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think that many of us, particularly professionals of any kind, learn to train ourselves to think in both modes because of the different types of work that we do.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 10:17:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2624901</link><description>&lt;p&gt;YOu're really asking about right brain versus left brain - I'm multi-hemispheric .. so I do a little both.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beth Kanter</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 09:50:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2624167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I work in support, so by definition work is random, with requests and problems arriving at unpredicable times and frequency.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But when the support work stops and I have time for project work, I can't get out of the random approach. I end up spending a huge amount of time spinning my wheels trying to do a little bit of each part of the different projects, instead of just focusing on doing and completing one part.  I wish I could switch to linear mode, but it's not easy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jonathan Allen</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 08:50:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2571787</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely more on the random-access side.  In fact, yeah, I have trouble with set sequences.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Phil Glockner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:58:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2570576</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A number of other readers feel the same way, it seems.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:31:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2570508</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Definitely a "random access" type of guy. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JayCruz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2568620</link><description>&lt;p&gt;In manufacturing, the "switching" cost that you mention is called the changeover cost.  In the past, manufacturing's aim was to go for long runs than minimized changeovers to different products to reduce those costs.  Now the goal is to allow more changeovers, smaller batch sizes, and more variety at a lower cost.  A universal concept, perhaps.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:07:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2568353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm completely Random Access - but since I use lists and track my time, I'm still able to get things done.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Alex Fayle | Someday Syndrome</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:48:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2568321</link><description>&lt;p&gt;When you drive through Nova Scotia, get off the Trans-Canada onto the old highway near Wentworth.  If you know where to stop, you can walk into the woods and find a nice little waterfall.  Far better than driving straight through from A to B.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am completely non-linear and random access.  The drawback is the context switching cost.  I flip between too many tasks too often.  The past few months I've been trying to balance that by focusing on getting 4 to 6 primary tasks done per day.  Then I can meander and flip as desired through other tasks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Derek Hatchard</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:45:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2568230</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Those are all good points, Charlie...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:39:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2568222</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can relate at times...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mark Dykeman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:38:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2568094</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Kinda half way in between but moving toward 'more structured' as (1) I get a lot more done. (2) It's positively healthier (IE: Breaks!) and (3) I get to see my wife once in a while&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">charlieanzman</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are you a sequential or random-access doer? | Broadcasting Brain</title><link>http://broadcasting-brain.com/2008/09/24/sequential-or-random-access-doer/#comment-2567992</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm beginning to believe that I have a bad case of A.D.D. I'm way too random in how I do my work.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">George Cozma</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:18:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>